Oragelo Von Parmala
Planetary Colony Construction
FUBAR.
0
   |
Posted - 2017.03.14 14:55:38 -
[1] - Quote
No doubt this will fall on deaf ears but I will say my bit for my own peace.
The changes that have been made to fighters is an obvious Nerf to null sec ratting/sig running in carriers. Which really is a shame, its almost like CCP doesn't understand the game anymore. There is so much isk in this game and people have been playing for so long that its a natural progression to these ships. But when t2 fighters drop at an alarming rate it doesn't take long to realize you will lose isk every time you undock. I understand the pro players seem to think they can hotkey or some such, but I don't see it. I mean, they melt even while attacking (thus moving). The other fact is, people lose these ships everyday, keeping the market pumping, promoting sales of the items to fit, etc. The risk vs reward has been undone by changes CCP has made, not the threat from players. You literally don't need to fit any shield or armor to your carrier because you wont be touched after you launch drones.
The Chimera redesign is a travesty. Already a ugly ship it now looks like a submarine with this boxed back end and a fin running the top. Even from a design standpoint you wouldn't put an exposed piece like that on top of a ship. Shocked
The Roqual, okay i get it, people were hardcore mining, guilty myself. But that did wonders for that market in general and again dozens popped everyday. Also, you made a ship viable, that had a lot of risk with the cost and getting caught in core. Why such a heavy pass on the first go? Its not like your known for coming back through and correcting the other way. (anytime this decade anyway)
You want to grow the game and keep your current player base, but these changes directly nerfed null activities. You discount what our doctrine ships cost or the structures you want built all over and fueled, etc. Do any of you actually play the game? It costs billions to plant a flag in null and grow it and these changes are counter intuitive to that. |